About Delegata Our Solutions Careers at Delegata
   
Our Solutions - Align Programs and Projects - " Delegata's philosophy is simple: build feasible solutions, standards, and methods."
Browse the Solutions Section by using the Menu below. Simply click on the appropriate menu item.

"Think BIG... Start small."
Solutions
Government Service Portals
Application Integration
PMO
Data Systems
Telecom Convergence
Set Up Your EA Program
Align Programs and Projects
Manage Development Configuration
Architect Interfaces
Manage Impacts of Change

White Papers

Diamond Methodology

Insourcing

Project Profiles
ADP - Enterprise Database
CalPERS - ACES (G2G/G2B)
CalPERS - Network Strategy
CalPERS - Self Service (G2P)
CalPERS - WCM
CDI - OASIS
DHS - Project Management
DOJ - APPS
DOJ - Enterprise Data Sharing
DOJ - EQAF
DOJ - PDMP
SCO - Agile Payment System
SJC - County Intranet Portal

 

HomeOur Solutions Align Programs and Projects

Align Programs and Projects


Solution - Align Programs and Projects - (.PDF 136KB)

The Challenge

Programs and projects exist for different purposes. Programs sustain business missions to achieve their ongoing results through operations that can be quality improved through continuous process improvement. Projects are often used to make stepwise improvements in capability, but exist to achieve an outcome within constraints of time, investment and quality of scope one time only. Projects often place significant pressure on programs due to operating at a significantly different pace that may not be coordinated with the program support they need. Leaders of programs generally believe that estimates for projects are as solid as those for operational execution. Projects rarely have a confidence level of over 50% at the initiation phase of the project. Programs supporting projects are often frustrated with the unusual expectations for unique results in unreasonable timeframes. Projects are often frustrated that business needs are not fully reflected in requirements at project initiation and changes are expected with no adjustment in constraints. In truth, programs and projects need to coexist to make each other successful.

The Approach

Programs and Projects need to understand the dynamics of the other’s performance model. Program managers need to be educated on the nature of projects; and projects need to be oriented to the capacity for programs to support their required pace of performance. Gaps in understanding need to be immediately recognized as risks since the impacts are inevitable. Structured thinking and proven practices can be put in place to help both programs and projects feel confident that they are aligned with one-another. By addressing systemic problems with the relationship through a project Charter or other governing documentation, both entities have greater potential to succeed. Expect that initiation will be much more difficult until the differences become better understood.

The Solution

Programs survive in today’s market based on their ability to rapidly change their capability and performance through projects. Programs and projects are inseparable, yet serve in completely different dynamics and lifecycles that impede the progress of one another if the conflicts are not understood. By capturing the dynamics of programs and projects and integrating activity to provide structure to build projects that are aligned with enterprise goals and architectures, the two entities can not only coexist, but thrive to deliver valuable results. If programs and projects provide performance and feedback to leaders through targeted dashboards for operational and project contributions it can lead to resolving independent perceptions that divide teams and drive the teams to aligned achievement. With an emphasis on enabling internal resources to carry important roles and capabilities for the company, operational and project improvements can be coupled with organization change practices to achieve incremental and substantial changes that set an organization apart from its peers.

The Benefits

Project productivity significantly improves for areas of operational contribution. Sub-optimization within silos is replaced with teamwork. Frustration from externally imposed impacts is reduced and replaced with best possible contribution. Resource effectiveness for both programs and projects is highly improved. Individual self esteem increases by being able to contribute effectively to terms they agree to. Performance based on process leads to much greater consistency of performance. Image and credibility of the program is highly improved for ability to enhance positive project impact.Capacity of programs and projects is used much more effectively and is more readily available. Outcomes are achieved more consistently.

TOP

 

  © 2010 Delegata Corporation | Terms of Use | Webmaster